AeroCampaign vs Mailchimp

Mailchimp bills your database. We bill the software.

Mailchimp's price rises with the number of contacts you store, whether or not you ever email them, and every send leaves on infrastructure shared with thousands of other tenants. AeroCampaign inverts both: a flat platform fee, and delivery through a provider account you own.

Feature by feature

The comparison, without the asterisks

CapabilityAeroCampaignMailchimp
Pricing basis
Their bill grows with your list whether or not you mail it.
Flat platform fee
Per contact, tiered
Cost per 1,000 emails
~$0.10 at SES cost
Bundled, marked up
Sends through your own provider
Your domain reputation is not pooled with other tenants.
Yes — SendGrid or SES
No
Own your sender reputation
Yes
Shared IP pools
AI copy per cohort
Yes
Templates + basic assist
AI copy per individual contact
Yes
No
Industry-trend grounding
Yes
No
Billed for unsubscribed / dead contacts
The single largest line of waste on a per-contact plan.
No — cleaning bundled
Yes, counted in tier
List cleaning and dedupe included
Yes, every tier
Third-party add-on
Autonomous outbound SDR
Yes
No
Managed campaign delivery
Yes, via services partner
Agency marketplace only
Cross-provider suppression
Unified, two-way sync
Platform-internal only
Bounce / complaint health thresholds
Surfaced at SES review levels
Partial
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe
Every send
Yes
Export your event stream
Full, normalized
Limited by plan
Contact list is portable
CSV in, CSV out, always
Export available
Why teams move

Three reasons people leave Mailchimp

The bill stops tracking your list

Mailchimp's tiers step up as contacts accumulate, which quietly penalises the thing every marketer is told to do — grow the list. A flat fee plus provider list price means a 40,000-contact list and a 400,000-contact list cost nearly the same to operate.

Your reputation stops being communal

On a shared platform your inbox placement is affected by senders you will never meet. With your own SES or SendGrid account, your domain and your IP warmth are yours — and they leave with you if you ever go.

Copy generated per cohort, not per campaign

Mailchimp's assistive AI helps you write one message faster. AeroCampaign's engine reads each contact's signal history and produces a different message per behavioural cohort, down to the individual where the signal justifies it.

The honest part

Where Mailchimp is still the better choice

Mailchimp has been shipping for two decades. Pretending otherwise would waste your time and ours.

Template gallery and drag-drop builder

Mailchimp's visual editor and template library are excellent and deep. AeroCampaign's composer is deliberately plain — HTML and text, no drag-drop canvas.

Integration breadth

Hundreds of native integrations across e-commerce, CRM, and ads. If your stack depends on a long tail of one-click connectors, that gap is real.

Journeys and automation

Multi-step customer journeys, cart abandonment, and behavioural automations are mature there. AeroCampaign ships broadcasts, not sequences.

Switch if
  • Your Mailchimp bill has grown faster than your sending volume
  • You already run Amazon SES or SendGrid, or would be comfortable setting one up
  • You send broadcasts and newsletters rather than multi-step journeys
  • You want copy that differs by segment without writing every variant yourself
  • Deliverability and sender reputation are things you actively manage
  • You run campaigns for multiple clients and want each on its own provider account
Stay if
  • Your team relies on the drag-drop builder and template gallery day to day
  • Multi-step automated journeys are core to how you sell
  • You depend on Mailchimp's native e-commerce or ads integrations
  • Nobody on the team wants to touch an AWS console or an API key

Try it alongside Mailchimp.

Connect a provider, import one list, and run a single campaign through the engine before you move anything else.

No credit card. Bring your own SendGrid or Amazon SES account.